Pathogenicity Calculator

Select evidence codes to see pathogenicity result for your variant. Based on ACMG Standards and Guidelines (2015).
Disclaimer: This feature is experimental and helps you to visualize ACMG standards. It should not be used to give medical reports alone.
Selected Evidence Codes:
None

Result:

Uncertain Significance
Edit Family Segregation (PP1):
PP1
Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease
PVS1
Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multiexon deletion) in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease
PS1
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change
PS2
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history. (The gene must be associated with the phenotype.)
PS3
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product
PS4
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared with the prevalence in controls
PM1
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g., active site of an enzyme) without benign variation
PM2
Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium
PM3
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant
PM4
Protein length changes as a result of in-frame deletions/insertions in a nonrepeat region or stop-loss variants
PM5
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before
PM6
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity
PP2
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and in which missense variants are a common mechanism of disease
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
PP4
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology
PP5
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation
BA1
Allele frequency is >5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium
BS1
Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder
BS2
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age
BS3
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing
BS4
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family
BP1
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease
BP2
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern
BP3
In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function
BP4
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
BP5
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease
BP6
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation
BP7
A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved